AT THE GOVERNMENTS "TERRORIST SCREENING CENTER" EVERYONE IS A TERRORIST OR AT LEAST ACTS LIKE ONE In order to keep the phony war on terrorism in your face 24-7, the government has trashed its old color-coded system in favor of an Orwellian Thought Crime System. THIS IS PART OF A REAL POLICE TRAINING FILM MADE FOR FOR THE COPS IN YOUR CITY BY THE FEDS WITH YOUR TAX DOLLARS. THE PUBLIC IS UNKNOWINGLY CATEGORIZED AS TERRORIST THREATS FOR POSSESSING THINGS LIKE CASH,CAMERA EQUIPMENT (see article below),BINOCULARS,MAPS,GPS,BUMPER STICKERS,SLEEPING BAGS, ETC.
ARE YOU A CATEGORY THREE?
ALEX JONE'S COMMENTS EDITED OUT OF CLIP
Man Is Beaten To A Pulp And Tortured By Brutal Cops For Filming Them From His Own Driveway
His face was bloodied and bruised. His $3,500 camera smashed and impounded by police, and charged with a felony for battery on a police officer. One month later, things have changed for Mitchell Crooks. The Clark County district attorney's office has dropped all charges, and Crooks has retained an attorney of his own. The Metropolitan Police Department has opened an internal investigation into the Las Vegas police officer, Derek Colling, who Mitchell Crooks says falsely arrested and beat him for filming police Crooks was later diagnosed with a deviated septum and a chest wall injury. ACLU Lawyers say officer was wrong. Allen Lichtenstein, an American Civil Liberties Union attorney, reviewed Crooks' video and said officer Colling was clearly in the wrong. Officers are trained to avoid escalating situations, but Colling initiated the incident and created a physical confrontation without provocation, he said. Police have no expectation of privacy, and it's perfectly legal to film officers as long as it does not interfere in their investigation, he said. Colling erred in claiming that Crooks was trespassing. By law, only a property owner or resident can make a trespassing complaint, Lichtenstein said. "Even if the officer didn't think he lived there, that doesn't mean he didn't have permission to be there,'' Lichtenstein said. "In the video I heard, that question was never asked." Officer Colling has been involved in two fatal shootings in his 5½ years as a Las Vegas police officer. Crooks made headlines in 2002 when he videotaped two Inglewood, Calif., police officers beating a 16-year-old boy. One officer was fired and criminally charged but was not convicted after two trials ended with hung juries. The incident strained race relations in Southern California -- the police officer was white, the teenager black. This incident will likely cost the taxpayers hundreds of thousands of dollars before it's over. Crooks' attorney, David Otto, on Thursday sent police a statement from Crooks, along with a demand for $500,000 to cover Crooks' medial care, pain and suffering.Colling had no legitimate reason to approach Crooks that night, Otto wrote. "Officer Colling was aggravated that a citizen should have the audacity to video tape, him -- a Las Vegas Metropolitan Patrol Officer,'' Otto wrote. "Officer Colling decided to use the fear and terror of his physical ability to beat Mr. Crooks into submission -- to teach Mr. Crooks and, by example, all citizens and residents of the Las Vegas Valley."
Officer Colling has already shot two individuals to death in his short 5 year career as a police officer.
The right to take photographs in the United States is being challenged more than ever. People are being stopped, harassed, and even intimidated into handing over their personal property simply because they were taking photographs of subjects that made other people uncomfortable. Recent examples have included photographing industrial plants, bridges, buildings, trains, and bus stations. For the most part, attempts to restrict photography are based on misguided fears about the supposed dangers that unrestricted photography presents to society. Ironically, unrestricted photography by private citizens has played an integral role in protecting the freedom, security, and well-being of all Americans. Photography in the United States has an established history of contributing to improvements in civil rights, curbing abusive child labor practices, and providing important information to crime investigators. Photography has not contributed to a decline in public safety or economic vitality in the United States. When people think back on the acts of domestic terrorism that have occurred over the last twenty years, none have depended on or even involved photography. Restrictions on photography would not have prevented any of these acts. Furthermore, the increase in people carrying small digital and cell phone cameras has resulted in the prevention of crimes and the apprehension of criminals,including cops
READ ENTIRE ARTICLE
300LB COP CHOKES AND ARRESTS NEWS CAMERAMAN FOR FILMING ON PUPLIC STREET
THIS IS JUST ONE OF THOUSANDS OF SIMILAR INCIDENTS
RECORDED ON VIDEO ACROSS THE COUNTRY ~~~ IT' GOING ON ALL DAY EVERY DAY
THIS SHAMEFUL VIDEO IS THE GRAPHIC REASON WE MUST PROTECT OUR RIGHT TO VIDEO RECORD SO CALLED "LAW ENFORCEMNT" POLICE SHOOT LAWYER IN THE FACE AND LATER LAUGH ABOUT IT (ON TAPE!)
ARE YOU A CATEGORY THREE?
ALEX JONE'S COMMENTS EDITED OUT OF CLIP
Man Is Beaten To A Pulp And Tortured By Brutal Cops For Filming Them From His Own Driveway
His face was bloodied and bruised. His $3,500 camera smashed and impounded by police, and charged with a felony for battery on a police officer. One month later, things have changed for Mitchell Crooks. The Clark County district attorney's office has dropped all charges, and Crooks has retained an attorney of his own. The Metropolitan Police Department has opened an internal investigation into the Las Vegas police officer, Derek Colling, who Mitchell Crooks says falsely arrested and beat him for filming police Crooks was later diagnosed with a deviated septum and a chest wall injury. ACLU Lawyers say officer was wrong. Allen Lichtenstein, an American Civil Liberties Union attorney, reviewed Crooks' video and said officer Colling was clearly in the wrong. Officers are trained to avoid escalating situations, but Colling initiated the incident and created a physical confrontation without provocation, he said. Police have no expectation of privacy, and it's perfectly legal to film officers as long as it does not interfere in their investigation, he said. Colling erred in claiming that Crooks was trespassing. By law, only a property owner or resident can make a trespassing complaint, Lichtenstein said. "Even if the officer didn't think he lived there, that doesn't mean he didn't have permission to be there,'' Lichtenstein said. "In the video I heard, that question was never asked." Officer Colling has been involved in two fatal shootings in his 5½ years as a Las Vegas police officer. Crooks made headlines in 2002 when he videotaped two Inglewood, Calif., police officers beating a 16-year-old boy. One officer was fired and criminally charged but was not convicted after two trials ended with hung juries. The incident strained race relations in Southern California -- the police officer was white, the teenager black. This incident will likely cost the taxpayers hundreds of thousands of dollars before it's over. Crooks' attorney, David Otto, on Thursday sent police a statement from Crooks, along with a demand for $500,000 to cover Crooks' medial care, pain and suffering.Colling had no legitimate reason to approach Crooks that night, Otto wrote. "Officer Colling was aggravated that a citizen should have the audacity to video tape, him -- a Las Vegas Metropolitan Patrol Officer,'' Otto wrote. "Officer Colling decided to use the fear and terror of his physical ability to beat Mr. Crooks into submission -- to teach Mr. Crooks and, by example, all citizens and residents of the Las Vegas Valley."
Officer Colling has already shot two individuals to death in his short 5 year career as a police officer.
The right to take photographs in the United States is being challenged more than ever. People are being stopped, harassed, and even intimidated into handing over their personal property simply because they were taking photographs of subjects that made other people uncomfortable. Recent examples have included photographing industrial plants, bridges, buildings, trains, and bus stations. For the most part, attempts to restrict photography are based on misguided fears about the supposed dangers that unrestricted photography presents to society. Ironically, unrestricted photography by private citizens has played an integral role in protecting the freedom, security, and well-being of all Americans. Photography in the United States has an established history of contributing to improvements in civil rights, curbing abusive child labor practices, and providing important information to crime investigators. Photography has not contributed to a decline in public safety or economic vitality in the United States. When people think back on the acts of domestic terrorism that have occurred over the last twenty years, none have depended on or even involved photography. Restrictions on photography would not have prevented any of these acts. Furthermore, the increase in people carrying small digital and cell phone cameras has resulted in the prevention of crimes and the apprehension of criminals,including cops
READ ENTIRE ARTICLE
300LB COP CHOKES AND ARRESTS NEWS CAMERAMAN FOR FILMING ON PUPLIC STREET
THIS IS JUST ONE OF THOUSANDS OF SIMILAR INCIDENTS
RECORDED ON VIDEO ACROSS THE COUNTRY ~~~ IT' GOING ON ALL DAY EVERY DAY
THIS SHAMEFUL VIDEO IS THE GRAPHIC REASON WE MUST PROTECT OUR RIGHT TO VIDEO RECORD SO CALLED "LAW ENFORCEMNT" POLICE SHOOT LAWYER IN THE FACE AND LATER LAUGH ABOUT IT (ON TAPE!)

No comments:
Post a Comment